<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fuel Cell Cars Aren&#8217;t Ready</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecoworld.com/blog/2006/03/16/fuel-cell-cars-arent-ready/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecoworld.com/blog/2006/03/16/fuel-cell-cars-arent-ready/</link>
	<description>Ed Ring's EcoWorld Posts</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael S.</title>
		<link>http://ecoworld.com/blog/2006/03/16/fuel-cell-cars-arent-ready/#comment-91230</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/03-16-2006/fuel-cell-cars-arent-ready/#comment-91230</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed,

Thanks for your post. What about natural gas vehicles. you haven't mentioned them in your article. Could that be a short term solution for big vehicles like campervans? 

I am a bit confused about that. Wikipedia states that: "Natural gas is often described as the cleanest fossil fuel, producing less carbon dioxide per joule delivered than either." 

BUT: "...in absolute terms it does contribute substantially to global emissions, and this contribution is projected to grow."

Scary: " In addition, natural gas itself is a greenhouse gas far more potent than carbon dioxide when released into the atmosphere but is not of large concern due to the small amounts in which this occurs"


Now what does this say? Changing to natural gas produces less carbon dioxide, but is more poisonous and still the cleanest fossil??

Help, can you clarify this for me?

Cheers, 

MiKe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>Thanks for your post. What about natural gas vehicles. you haven&#8217;t mentioned them in your article. Could that be a short term solution for big vehicles like campervans? </p>
<p>I am a bit confused about that. Wikipedia states that: &#8220;Natural gas is often described as the cleanest fossil fuel, producing less carbon dioxide per joule delivered than either.&#8221; </p>
<p>BUT: &#8220;&#8230;in absolute terms it does contribute substantially to global emissions, and this contribution is projected to grow.&#8221;</p>
<p>Scary: &#8221; In addition, natural gas itself is a greenhouse gas far more potent than carbon dioxide when released into the atmosphere but is not of large concern due to the small amounts in which this occurs&#8221;</p>
<p>Now what does this say? Changing to natural gas produces less carbon dioxide, but is more poisonous and still the cleanest fossil??</p>
<p>Help, can you clarify this for me?</p>
<p>Cheers, </p>
<p>MiKe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
