<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar Thermal Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecoworld.com/blog/2006/08/29/solar-thermal-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecoworld.com/blog/2006/08/29/solar-thermal-power/</link>
	<description>Ed Ring's EcoWorld Posts</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  7 Jan 2009 04:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Blitz</title>
		<link>http://ecoworld.com/blog/2006/08/29/solar-thermal-power/#comment-88145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Blitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2006/08/29/solar-thermal-power/#comment-88145</guid>
		<description>The cheapest form of solar thermal power is tower receiver.  Parabolic trough suffers from low Carnot efficiency, reduced storage options and much higher capital cost.  Troughs are first generation solar thermal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cheapest form of solar thermal power is tower receiver.  Parabolic trough suffers from low Carnot efficiency, reduced storage options and much higher capital cost.  Troughs are first generation solar thermal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
