2008 program
AlwaysOn GoingGreen 2008
2007 archives
AlwaysOn GoingGreen 2007
Programs by EcoWorld
Send an
Electronic
Postcard
by boua bi bali on 08/30/08
je suis interese par cette
culture. voudrais savoir
comment avoir les grais...
by McCain’... on 08/29/08
[...] Also, consider that
Alaskan oil could reduce
American oil imports...
by Paul on 08/29/08
Sir, I read your article
dated Augustn 2005. Since
then is there a...
by K on 08/29/08
The last thing we need to do
if we truly want "safe"
energy is to just shift o...
by Andrew Okello on 08/29/08
dear sir , After five years
of very hard work we have
now set up a biodiesel pla...
by qgln bwnl on 08/29/08
uvanbgzt kpydari klfxp rwgc
rufp noyiprcsd mgkb
by Christian Cu... on 08/28/08
The solution is so simple
noone will even speak of it.
Write checks to homeowner...
EcoWorld Commentary
Ed Ring,
Editor-in-Chief
Daniela Muhawi,
Editor-at-Large
Contributing Editors
(comments are welcome)

Maps & Information




Today is Saturday August 30, 2008
Editor's Commentary

Check Dams & Deadbeat Dams

Posted on: December 5th, 2006 by Ed Ring

In our last post, “Dams & Greenhouse Gas,” we took the International Rivers Network to task for putting out a study that claimed dams are a “significant global source of greenhouse gasses.”  Because if you dug into the underlying facts, the estimated contribution greenhouse gasses make to total anthropogenic CO2 emissions are a whopping .7% (seven-tenths of one percent).

There are many problems with dams, and greenhouse gas emissions (itself a topic not beyond debate) are not one of them.  For a serious discussion of the problems with dams, we turn to the Property and Environment Research Center, who recently published an essay by James Workman entitled “Deadbeat Dams.”  Workman is succinct and comprehensive in his descriptions of why dams have outlived their usefulness:  “antiquated dams have a lot going against them: seismic shifts shake them from below; compound water pressures scour them from behind; sediment fills reservoirs; evaporation drinks more than people; and invasive species choke intake and out flow.”  Let’s not forget all those salmon…

Not only does Workman explain that most dams have a useful life and afterwards can cause more harm than good, he presents a practical way to get rid of obsolete dams:  “businesses seek out credits generated by third-party projects for environmental services in advance of their proposed development—and pay handsomely for them…the average obsolete dam may be worth far more broken up than left intact; the sum of its removed parts are worth more than the integrated whole. Busting the dam could release a net gain in legitimate, measurable economic value, which can be brought to market and sold to willing buyers.”

Workman estimates there are 79,000 dams in the United States, and that 85% of these dams are no longer providing economic benefits.  Meanwhile there are developers throughout the USA who are trying to provide new industrial, commercial and residential facilities for a country whose population just topped 300 million and grows by over 3 million per year.  All of them are required to mitigate whatever land and habitat their developments encroach upon, usually by ratios well beyond one-to-one.

Another noteworthy point regarding dams is the value of an alternative to mega-dams, which is to build small check dams.  These dams catch seasonal flows and divert the water to temporary basins where they refill aquifiers.  This is a terrific way to recharge the water tables, particularly in areas where wells for crop irrigation have drawn underground water reserves to dangerously low levels.  Here are some references, including links to reports on communities in India who have successfully built check dams:

Check Dams in Utility canyon running into Bay of Bengal

Check Dams and Sustainable LivelyhoodsCheck Dam through Shramdan

For more about water issues in India, read our feature “India’s Water Future.”

Human Development Report 2006
Read the section on water harvesting; pages 195-197

This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 5th, 2006 at 10:36 pm and is filed under Water. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Check Dams & Deadbeat Dams”

  1. Tim Kingston Says:

    Excellent posting. This advocacy of small scale dams for recharging aquifers is exactly the kind of alternative to large projects that IRN supports and endorses. Thank you.

  2. About dams (Technorati / Ecoworld) « Desertification Says:

    [...] http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2006/12/05/check-dams-deadbeat-dams// [...]

Leave a Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

Search

Recent Posts


Categories

Biofuel (50)
Biodiesel (10)
Ethanol (14)
Buildings (33)
CleanTech (32)
Climate (95)
Energy (165)
Electricity (86)
Fossil Fuel (7)
Geothermal (4)
Wind (6)
Forests (42)
Investment (13)
Nature (9)
Animals (9)
Politics (132)
Gov't Reform (12)
Groups (3)
Land Use (22)
Media (2)
Solar (40)
Photovoltaic (30)
Thermal (13)
Vehicles (70)
Green Cars (69)
Transit (1)
Water (41)

Archives

August 2008 (6)
July 2008 (10)
June 2008 (7)
May 2008 (12)
April 2008 (10)
March 2008 (23)
February 2008 (11)
January 2008 (12)
December 2007 (17)
November 2007 (12)
October 2007 (18)
September 2007 (9)
2008 (91)
2007 (127)
2006 (102)

Links

Treelink.org
AUTO SHIPPING
New Hybrid Cars
Toyota Prius
Cheap Gas Prices
Latest Hybrid Cars
GreenBuzz Newsletter
Sustainable Land Development Today
Tree Bank