2008 program
AlwaysOn GoingGreen 2008
2007 archives
AlwaysOn GoingGreen 2007
Programs by EcoWorld
Send an
Electronic
Postcard
(See all Comments)
by Kimberlee on 12/04/08
i like your pics can we make
them larger............
by Lew on 12/04/08
American imports 3.67
billion barrels of oil
yearly, as of 2005. Wi...
by Ridhwan on 12/03/08
Dear Lukuni, Am also a
biodiesel enthusiast from
Mombasa Island am setting...
by Sudhir on 12/03/08
Dear Sir, I am interested in
obtaining distributorship
for solar ener...
by Moe Jones on 12/03/08
Is there a way to convert
our old clunkers into green
energy electric cars? I lo...
by Dave on 12/02/08
I think that the only viable
partial solution to climate
change is the Trans Glob...
by wimal perera on 12/02/08
Please let us know whom to
contact to get more details,
regarding solar pow...
(See all Comments)
EcoWorld Commentary
Ed Ring,
Editor-in-Chief
Daniela Muhawi,
Editor-at-Large
Contributing Editors
(comments are welcome)

Maps & Information




Today is Thursday December 04, 2008
Editor's Commentary

Sverdrups & Brine

Posted on: July 27th, 2007 by Ed Ring

A “Sverdrup,” named after the famed Norwegian geologist who defined this unit of measure, is the largest quantity commonly used to express volumes of water flow. Naturally, the highest volumes of water flowing on this planet are ocean currents, such as the Gulf Stream, which warms Europe and flows at a rate of of 30 to 150 Sverdrups, depending on latitude.

So how much water is in a Sverdrup, after all? Apparently, one Sverdrup is equivalent to “one million cubic meters of water per second.” In practical terms this is equivalent to delivering one cubic kilometer of water (weighing exactly one gigaton) in just under seventeen minutes. That is one heck of a lot of water. That is a very big pipeline.

And what do Sverdrups have to do with brine? It has to do with whether or not to approve construction of desalination plants, which if built using modern technology all over the world, would eliminate world water scarcity. Apparently environmentalist conventional wisdom says it’s ok to install marine current turbines and offshore windmills and tidal hydro installations, but one cannot lay a pipeline capable of transporting tens of cubic kilometers per year of brine into an ocean current, because it will make the ocean saltier. But this objection completely overlooks the volume of offshore marine currents, expressed in Sverdrups.

Brine comes from desalination plants. “Brine” is a painfully misleading word, since normally a desalination plant returns seven parts of slightly saltier water, referred to as brine, to the ocean for each unit of fresh water that is extracted from the seawater. At less than 20% saltier than the ocean, it doesn’t take much current to easily disburse this volume of brine.

A cubic kilometer (km3) of fresh water can easily sustain 3.0 million people in residential urban and suburban settings, since one cubic kilometer is sufficient to provide 241 gallons per day per person to a million people - 913 liters per day per person! This would work in places such as greater Los Angeles, since with seven km3 of brine for every km3 of recovered fresh water, desalinating water for sixty million residents would only require 140 km3 per year of water to get dumped into the California channel. Wow! 140 cubic kilometers of brine discharge per year! 34 cubic miles! That’s a lot of seawater, 16% saltier, going into any ocean, isn’t it?

No. Just one Sverdrup of current volume is equal to 31,558 cubic kilometers per year. This means in a one Sverdrup current the brine discharge pipes from desalination plants servicing 60 million people would disburse brine that, per year, would increase the salinity of the current by a mere seven one-hundredths of one percent. And in the California current which is at least several Sverdrups even fairly close to shore, the impact of brine from 60 million people’s water desalination would probably be at most a tenth of that, or seven one-thousandths of one percent, especially when one considers the subsurface to surface upwellings, different currents, which also move Sverdrup volumes of water per year off the coast of California.

As for power requirements, a cubic kilometer of fresh water can be extracted from the sea for less energy than it takes to pump this water over the Tehachapi Mountains. So if you like wave and current and tidal energy, break out the underwater bulldozers and while you’re at it, desalinate water for Southern California, and turn off the pumps.

This entry was posted on Friday, July 27th, 2007 at 11:16 pm and is filed under Politics, Water. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Sverdrups & Brine”

  1. Brian Hayes Says:

    In July 2007, the public utility branch of the Singapore government reported the world’s lowest cost to desalinate part of its water supply at US53 cents per cubic meter. They’ve replaced the conventional 8 inch process pipe with a new 16 inch reverse osmosis system. Singapore imports more than half it’s water under expiring contracts from Malaysia and is looking toward water independence.

    Does this new cost factor reflect your impressive challenge? I call it “The Tehachapi Calculation”!!

Leave a Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

AUTO SHIPPING
New Hybrid Cars
Toyota Prius
Cheap Gas Prices
Latest Hybrid Cars
GreenBuzz Newsletter

Archives

November 2008 (8)
October 2008 (11)
September 2008 (11)
August 2008 (6)
July 2008 (10)
June 2008 (7)
May 2008 (12)
April 2008 (10)
March 2008 (23)
February 2008 (11)
January 2008 (12)
December 2007 (17)
2008 (121)
2007 (127)
2006 (102)
2002 (1)

Links

Affordable Housing Design
Alternative Energy Blog
Alternative Energy Stocks
Alternative Energy Today
AlwaysOn - High Tech & Green Tech
American Dream Coalition
American Institute of Architects
AutoblogGreen
Big Biofuels Blog
BIOconversion Blog
Biofuel Review
BlueVoice.org
Camino Energy
Cato Institute
Clean Edge
Cleantech Blog
Climate Science
CNET Greentech
Congress for the New Urbanism
earth2tech
Edmunds Green Car Advisor
Electric Power Research Institute
Environmental Republican
ESRI Conservation Program
EV World
Evangelical Ecologist
Green Business
Green Car Congress
Green Car Guide
GreenBiz
Greencar.com
Greenpeace Blog
Gristmill
Hybrid Car Blog
ICIS Biofuels Blog
International Atomic Energy Agency
International Energy Agency
International Solar Energy Society
Living Lands & Waters
Money Morning
Mongabay.com
National Biodiesel Board
National Hydropower Association
National Renewable Energy Lab
New Urban News
Oilgae.com
Pension Tsunami
Rainforest Action Network
RealClimate.org
Renewable Energy Stocks
Rocky Mountain Institute
SeaWatch.org
SeaWeb.org
Sierra Club Compass Blog
Society for Ecological Restoration
Solar Energy Industries Association
SolarBuzz.com
The Antiplanner
The Energy Blog
The Green Car Website
The Reason Foundation
The Wildlands Project
Treehugger
Trees Water People
U.S. Green Building Council
UN Food & Agricultural Organization
Urban Land Institute
Urban Planning Blog
US Dept. of Energy
US Environmental Protection Agency
WildAid
World Coal Institute
World Nuclear Association
World Resources Institute
World Wildlife Fund