<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tesla Motors Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecoworld.com/blog/2007/10/01/tesla-motors-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecoworld.com/blog/2007/10/01/tesla-motors-update/</link>
	<description>Ed Ring's EcoWorld Posts</description>
	<pubDate>Thu,  8 Jan 2009 23:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://ecoworld.com/blog/2007/10/01/tesla-motors-update/#comment-45619</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2007/10/01/tesla-motors-update/#comment-45619</guid>
		<description>Very well Bryan - you got me.  How 'bout the ME 262?  Can that be compared with the Tesla?  Aviation buffs have reminded me that despite it being the first operational jet fighter, it had a very short range and engines that were too hot for the metal Germany could produce at the time...

I guess the bottom line to me is that Tesla appears to be still on track to deliver the first production all electric car since the EV-1, if not since the very early electric models 100 years ago.  For that I'm still cheering for them.  But I agree with you that technologies are coming that may make the technology used on the Tesla obsolete within years, not decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well Bryan - you got me.  How &#8217;bout the ME 262?  Can that be compared with the Tesla?  Aviation buffs have reminded me that despite it being the first operational jet fighter, it had a very short range and engines that were too hot for the metal Germany could produce at the time&#8230;</p>
<p>I guess the bottom line to me is that Tesla appears to be still on track to deliver the first production all electric car since the EV-1, if not since the very early electric models 100 years ago.  For that I&#8217;m still cheering for them.  But I agree with you that technologies are coming that may make the technology used on the Tesla obsolete within years, not decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://ecoworld.com/blog/2007/10/01/tesla-motors-update/#comment-45563</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2007/10/01/tesla-motors-update/#comment-45563</guid>
		<description>I must humorously disagree with both the initial comparison and  subsequent correction when the Tesla Roadster was compared to  advanced fighter aircraft.  In my opinion, the Tesla Roadster and similar efforts are best compared to the very earliest attempts by those who were seeking man powered flight in the late 1800's/early 1900's.  

The Tesla Roadster itself might be compared to the Wright Flyer--which was taken to numerous exhibitions, flown before many and became quite popular during the first decade of the Twentieth Century.  This interest quickly faded as more and more useful aircraft were built.  In fact, most will agree that the British developed Sopwith Camel--which took its maiden flight just thirteen years after the Wright's first successful flight at Kitty Hawk (almost to the day)--is the best remembered "early performance aircraft" of significant notoriety. 

Why did the US have to purchase planes from the British and French during WW I if our country invented manned flight in the first place?  Because we became entangled in a political, academic and legal debate over who flew first: The Wrights or Sam Langly???  While this debate drug on and on over the years, both our friends and enemies were busy improving our invention. 

I mentioned this to say humanity hasn't even begun to take advantage of current and developing technologies!  We are far distant from attaining the level of efficiency that could be achieved it is nearly is nearly laughable.  

Mr. Musk is creative, has good business savvy, ideas and really knows how to speak to the investors well.  However, he lacks somewhat in his knowledge of advanced materials, what technologies are being developed and how to protect his investor's dollars from a case of "sudden technological obsolescence." 

Don't be surprised if the Telsa Roadster and other similar vehicles are rendered completely obsolete and undesirable within the next few by technologies orders of magnitude more efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must humorously disagree with both the initial comparison and  subsequent correction when the Tesla Roadster was compared to  advanced fighter aircraft.  In my opinion, the Tesla Roadster and similar efforts are best compared to the very earliest attempts by those who were seeking man powered flight in the late 1800&#8217;s/early 1900&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>The Tesla Roadster itself might be compared to the Wright Flyer&#8211;which was taken to numerous exhibitions, flown before many and became quite popular during the first decade of the Twentieth Century.  This interest quickly faded as more and more useful aircraft were built.  In fact, most will agree that the British developed Sopwith Camel&#8211;which took its maiden flight just thirteen years after the Wright&#8217;s first successful flight at Kitty Hawk (almost to the day)&#8211;is the best remembered &#8220;early performance aircraft&#8221; of significant notoriety. </p>
<p>Why did the US have to purchase planes from the British and French during WW I if our country invented manned flight in the first place?  Because we became entangled in a political, academic and legal debate over who flew first: The Wrights or Sam Langly???  While this debate drug on and on over the years, both our friends and enemies were busy improving our invention. </p>
<p>I mentioned this to say humanity hasn&#8217;t even begun to take advantage of current and developing technologies!  We are far distant from attaining the level of efficiency that could be achieved it is nearly is nearly laughable.  </p>
<p>Mr. Musk is creative, has good business savvy, ideas and really knows how to speak to the investors well.  However, he lacks somewhat in his knowledge of advanced materials, what technologies are being developed and how to protect his investor&#8217;s dollars from a case of &#8220;sudden technological obsolescence.&#8221; </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be surprised if the Telsa Roadster and other similar vehicles are rendered completely obsolete and undesirable within the next few by technologies orders of magnitude more efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://ecoworld.com/blog/2007/10/01/tesla-motors-update/#comment-41240</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2007/10/01/tesla-motors-update/#comment-41240</guid>
		<description>Much has been made of the Tesla's high price tag. The performance numbers recently released rank the car at about the level of the Porsche 911 GT3, which runs about $20,000 more. Add in the much lower cost per mile, lack of pollution, and I think we have a winner!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much has been made of the Tesla&#8217;s high price tag. The performance numbers recently released rank the car at about the level of the Porsche 911 GT3, which runs about $20,000 more. Add in the much lower cost per mile, lack of pollution, and I think we have a winner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
