2008 program
AlwaysOn GoingGreen 2008
2007 archives
AlwaysOn GoingGreen 2007
Programs by EcoWorld
Send an
Electronic
Postcard
by McCain’... on 08/29/08
[...] Also, consider that
Alaskan oil could reduce
American oil imports...
by Paul on 08/29/08
Sir, I read your article
dated Augustn 2005. Since
then is there a...
by K on 08/29/08
The last thing we need to do
if we truly want "safe"
energy is to just shift o...
by Andrew Okello on 08/29/08
dear sir , After five years
of very hard work we have
now set up a biodiesel pla...
by qgln bwnl on 08/29/08
uvanbgzt kpydari klfxp rwgc
rufp noyiprcsd mgkb
by Christian Cu... on 08/28/08
The solution is so simple
noone will even speak of it.
Write checks to homeowner...
by Raja Deepak on 08/28/08
Hi Sir It is very amazing to
read about bio diesel in
india , the web site is ve...
EcoWorld Commentary
Ed Ring,
Editor-in-Chief
Daniela Muhawi,
Editor-at-Large
Contributing Editors
(comments are welcome)

Maps & Information




Today is Friday August 29, 2008
Editor's Commentary

Caterpillar and CleanAIR

Posted on: June 18th, 2008 by Ed Ring

We have never simply posted a press release, but they remain essential to keeping track of what’s going on out there. Today we received two press releases, almost back to back, that have a lot to do with each other.

The first one announced a major new partnership between Caterpillar, “the world’s leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, clean diesel and natural gas engines and gas turbines,” with CleanAIR Systems of Santa Fe, New Mexico.  The announcement continues: “CleanAIR’s reduction technology will be installed on existing Caterpillar commercial engine applications to reduce diesel particulate matter, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and NOx.”

Literally minutes later, another press release arrived in the in-box, this one promoting a book entitled “The Coming China Wars,” by Peter Navarro.  We certainly hope there won’t be “China Wars” on the way, but as the book describes, China’s challenges as such a huge and rapidly growing nation are many.  Here’s an excerpt:  “unlike in the United States, Germany, or Japan where sophisticated pollution-control technologies are deployed, much of what Chinese power plants and factories spew in the air is not just sulfur dioxide but also a high percentage of fine particulate matter. This is a critical observation because particulate matter is the most damaging form of airborne pollutants.”

At the risk of pointing out the obvious, this is what we should be worrying about with China right now - the genuine, immediately unhealthy pollution coming from burning fossil fuel.  The problem is we are so focused on CO2 emissions, we are taking the spotlight away from particulate matter, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and NOx.  Even if we aren’t ignoring these more immediate and deadly pollutants completely, and this is key, the trajectory of reductions is slowed down because we are so focused on CO2.

The ability of the fully industrialized nations to provide advanced technologies that would render the burning of fossil fuel virtually clean - except for the CO2 - is already here.  We have proven technologies to accomplish these goals that get better and cheaper every day.  And the Chinese certainly have the money and know-how to deploy these technologies.  In fact, their coal plants use coal more efficiently than most of the plants in western nations, because they are newer plants.  They simply need to install the scrubbers.

Even more ironic is the fact that if China accellerated the building of modern coal plants, it would actually reduce air pollution in China, because these plants would provide energy to countless millions of households that currently rely as well on coal because they are off-grid.  And unlike power plants that produce hundreds of megawatts of power, off-grid coal is almost impossible to regulate.

If they aren’t already, Caterpillar and CleanAIR technologies should go to China and sell their clean technology.  And if environmentalists might embrace a greater measure of complexity, they might advocate diplomacy and protocols that emphasize the possible - healthy clean fossil fuel power plants - instead of the impossible - pumping 25+ cubic kilometers per year of CO2 into fissures in the earth.  And if we actually did that, the unintended geologic consequences might make the biofueled, CO2 offset subsidy enabled burning of Borneo look like a small campfire.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 18th, 2008 at 4:39 pm and is filed under CleanTech, Energy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Tags: , , ,

Leave a Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

Search

Recent Posts


Categories

Biofuel (50)
Biodiesel (10)
Ethanol (14)
Buildings (33)
CleanTech (32)
Climate (95)
Energy (165)
Electricity (86)
Fossil Fuel (7)
Geothermal (4)
Wind (6)
Forests (42)
Investment (13)
Nature (9)
Animals (9)
Politics (132)
Gov't Reform (12)
Groups (3)
Land Use (22)
Media (2)
Solar (40)
Photovoltaic (30)
Thermal (13)
Vehicles (70)
Green Cars (69)
Transit (1)
Water (41)

Archives

August 2008 (6)
July 2008 (10)
June 2008 (7)
May 2008 (12)
April 2008 (10)
March 2008 (23)
February 2008 (11)
January 2008 (12)
December 2007 (17)
November 2007 (12)
October 2007 (18)
September 2007 (9)
2008 (91)
2007 (127)
2006 (102)

Links

Profitable Reforesting
Sustainable Land Development Today
AUTO SHIPPING
New Hybrid Cars
Toyota Prius
Cheap Gas Prices
Latest Hybrid Cars
GreenBuzz Newsletter
Tree Bank